Back to Latest Briefings

July 21, 2026
AI-Enhanced
I didn’t abandon my client; I travelled for my daughter’s graduation – Atta Akyea
Policy
Key Points
- Samuel Atta Akyea, lead counsel for NPP Ashanti Regional Chairman Chairman Wontumi, explained his absence during his client's jailing.
- His absence was primarily due to attending his daughter's graduation in the United Kingdom.
- He also cited legal considerations, expecting the High Court to refer constitutional issues raised by the defence to the Supreme Court.
- Atta Akyea believed that such a referral would have made his presence unnecessary at the time of judgment.
- He denied abandoning his client and confirmed plans to appeal the High Court's decision, citing constitutional and procedural errors.
Why This Matters
This incident highlights ongoing legal and procedural debates within Ghana's judiciary, particularly concerning the hierarchy of courts and the referral of constitutional matters. The involvement of a prominent political figure and the subsequent appeal will test the robustness and fairness of the Ghanaian legal system, potentially influencing public perception of justice and judicial independence in high-profile cases.
Read Full Article
View original sourceRelated Articles
September 4, 2026
CJ’s remarks on SOEs were made in good faith, not to undermine judicial independence – Judicial Service
- The Judicial Service has responded to public debate regarding Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie's recent comments on state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
- The Chief Justice had praised the performance of SOEs like MIIF and SSNIT under the current administration, contrasting it with the previous eight years.
- These remarks drew criticism from groups like CDD-Ghana and the NPP, who raised concerns about political bias and the undermining of judicial independence.
- Critics argued that the head of the Judiciary should avoid public comments that could be perceived as political commentary on successive governments.
- The Judicial Service clarified that the comments were made in good faith, not intended to undermine judicial independence, and reaffirmed the CJ's commitment to the Judiciary's constitutional role.
September 4, 2026
‘OSP hasn’t contacted me’ – Patricia Appiagyei assures cooporation if invited
- The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) has initiated preliminary investigations into an alleged GH¢70,000 payment.
- The payment is purportedly linked to Parliament’s vetting process for ministerial and Supreme Court nominees.
- Deputy Minority Leader Patricia Appiagyei is central to the investigation, following a purported memorandum attributed to her questioning the funds.
- Appiagyei states she has not yet been formally contacted by the OSP but affirms she will honour any official invitation.
- The OSP aims to verify the authenticity of the document, the source and purpose of the alleged funds, and investigate potential extortion involving MPs.
September 4, 2026
This is an attempt to break the Minority caucus – Patricia Appiagyei on alleged GH¢70k payment
- Deputy Minority Leader Patricia Appiagyei has denied authoring a memorandum regarding an alleged GH¢70,000 payment.
- She described the document as a fabricated attempt to create divisions and undermine the unity within the Minority caucus.
- Appiagyei stated that the caucus remains united despite the alleged attempt to break it.
- Investigations are ongoing to establish the source of the purported memorandum, though she could not identify its creator.
- The controversy is linked to alleged payments concerning the recent vetting of ministerial and Supreme Court nominees, prompting preliminary investigations by the Office of the Special Prosecutor.


