Back to Latest Briefings

August 18, 2026
AI-Enhanced
GoldBod cannot hide behind agency role to escape accountability – Afenyo-Markin
Money
Policy
Key Points
- Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin rejects GoldBod’s argument that its role as an agent for the Bank of Ghana (BoG) absolves it of responsibility for losses in gold trading operations.
- Afenyo-Markin asserts that GoldBod, despite its agency relationship, retains operational responsibility for transactions involving billions of cedis in public resources.
- The Minority demands detailed explanations from GoldBod regarding gold prices, premiums, off-taker selection, sales discounts, service charges, and risk management.
- Concerns are raised about a potential “moral hazard” if GoldBod earns transaction-based income while the BoG bears underlying trading losses, potentially incentivizing excessive transactions.
- Afenyo-Markin calls for an investigation into whether the incentive structure contributed to reported 22 billion cedis in losses, dismissing GoldBod's reported surplus as an insufficient defense.
Why This Matters
This issue is highly significant for Ghana as it directly impacts the financial accountability and transparency of state institutions managing critical national resources, specifically in the gold sector. The alleged 22 billion cedis in losses and concerns about potential moral hazard raise serious questions about financial governance and the prudent use of public funds, which can undermine public trust and economic stability.
Read Full Article
View original sourceRelated Articles
August 24, 2026
GoldBod denies GH¢1bn BoG overdraft claim, demands retraction and apology from Boako
- The Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) has vehemently denied claims by MP Dr. Gideon Boako that it owes the Bank of Ghana (BoG) a GH¢1 billion overdraft.
- Dr. Boako, a Deputy Ranking Member on Parliament’s Finance Committee, questioned GoldBod's reported GH¢907 million profit, stating an outstanding overdraft would reflect a loss.
- GoldBod labeled Dr. Boako’s claim as “totally false,” a “deliberate and malicious smear campaign,” and demanded a retraction and apology.
- This dispute is set against a broader political and economic debate concerning GoldBod’s financial performance and the accounting treatment of GH¢22 billion losses from the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme (DGPP).
- GoldBod asserts it has never taken any loan, overdraft, or debt instrument from the Bank of Ghana or any financial institution since its establishment.
August 24, 2026
GoldBod losses remain key on Minority agenda as Parliament reconvenes – Afenyo-Markin
- The NPP Minority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, reaffirmed the caucus's commitment to investigate a reported US$1.7 billion loss linked to the Bank of Ghana’s Domestic Gold Purchase Programme and the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod).
- This commitment was reiterated after Afenyo-Markin met with NPP flagbearer Dr Mahamudu Bawumia in Accra.
- Dr Bawumia commended the Minority Caucus for its accountability efforts and encouraged their continued work.
- The reported loss, equivalent to about 1.5% of Ghana’s GDP, will be a key issue for the Minority as Parliament reconvenes.
- The Minority is resolute in pursuing the matter to get answers for the Ghanaian public regarding the circumstances of the loss.
August 23, 2026
Why celebrate $2.62bn FDI while losing $1.7bn under the Domestic Gold Programme? IERPP asks
- The Institute of Economic Research and Public Policy (IERPP) welcomes Ghana's US$2.62 billion Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as a sign of investor confidence.
- However, IERPP tempers this optimism with concern over an estimated GH¢22 billion (US$1.7 billion) loss from the Domestic Gold Purchase Program (DGPP).
- The DGPP loss is significant, equating to about 65 cents for every US$1 of FDI attracted, highlighting a major resource management issue.
- IERPP emphasizes that while FDI is crucial, it cannot substitute for prudent management and protection of existing public resources.
- The Institute calls for greater transparency, a clear breakdown of DGPP losses, and intense scrutiny from accountability institutions, Parliament, and civil society.

