Back to Latest Briefings
August 16, 2026
AI-Enhanced
Building Ghana better: Why architects must be at the heart of national development
Money
Policy
Opportunity
Growth
Key Points
- Architecture is crucial for national development, extending beyond aesthetics to create safe, functional, sustainable, and inclusive environments.
- Ghana's rapid urbanization and significant infrastructure investment necessitate early involvement of architects to prevent costly issues and ensure long-term value.
- Architects are vital in addressing emerging challenges like affordable housing, climate change, and accessibility through innovative, multidisciplinary design solutions.
- Strengthening the professional capacity of Ghanaian architects is essential for adopting digital technologies and meeting international standards while addressing local realities.
- The Architectural Society of Ghana (ASG) advocates for architects to play a more central role in national development conversations, policy-making, and setting standards for the built environment.
Why This Matters
This article highlights that Ghana's future quality of life, economic productivity, and environmental sustainability depend heavily on thoughtful architectural planning and design, especially with rapid urbanization and infrastructure investment. By integrating architects early in the development process and empowering the profession, Ghana can create resilient, inclusive, and efficient communities for current and future generations.
Read Full Article
View original sourceRelated Articles
August 24, 2026
GoldBod denies GH¢1bn BoG overdraft claim, demands retraction and apology from Boako
- The Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) has vehemently denied claims by MP Dr. Gideon Boako that it owes the Bank of Ghana (BoG) a GH¢1 billion overdraft.
- Dr. Boako, a Deputy Ranking Member on Parliament’s Finance Committee, questioned GoldBod's reported GH¢907 million profit, stating an outstanding overdraft would reflect a loss.
- GoldBod labeled Dr. Boako’s claim as “totally false,” a “deliberate and malicious smear campaign,” and demanded a retraction and apology.
- This dispute is set against a broader political and economic debate concerning GoldBod’s financial performance and the accounting treatment of GH¢22 billion losses from the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme (DGPP).
- GoldBod asserts it has never taken any loan, overdraft, or debt instrument from the Bank of Ghana or any financial institution since its establishment.
August 24, 2026
GoldBod losses remain key on Minority agenda as Parliament reconvenes – Afenyo-Markin
- The NPP Minority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, reaffirmed the caucus's commitment to investigate a reported US$1.7 billion loss linked to the Bank of Ghana’s Domestic Gold Purchase Programme and the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod).
- This commitment was reiterated after Afenyo-Markin met with NPP flagbearer Dr Mahamudu Bawumia in Accra.
- Dr Bawumia commended the Minority Caucus for its accountability efforts and encouraged their continued work.
- The reported loss, equivalent to about 1.5% of Ghana’s GDP, will be a key issue for the Minority as Parliament reconvenes.
- The Minority is resolute in pursuing the matter to get answers for the Ghanaian public regarding the circumstances of the loss.
August 23, 2026
Why celebrate $2.62bn FDI while losing $1.7bn under the Domestic Gold Programme? IERPP asks
- The Institute of Economic Research and Public Policy (IERPP) welcomes Ghana's US$2.62 billion Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as a sign of investor confidence.
- However, IERPP tempers this optimism with concern over an estimated GH¢22 billion (US$1.7 billion) loss from the Domestic Gold Purchase Program (DGPP).
- The DGPP loss is significant, equating to about 65 cents for every US$1 of FDI attracted, highlighting a major resource management issue.
- IERPP emphasizes that while FDI is crucial, it cannot substitute for prudent management and protection of existing public resources.
- The Institute calls for greater transparency, a clear breakdown of DGPP losses, and intense scrutiny from accountability institutions, Parliament, and civil society.