Back to Latest Briefings
July 7, 2026
AI-Enhanced
Living with water: Lessons from Netherlands
Money
Policy
Opportunity
Growth
Key Points
- The Netherlands, despite being a low-lying country highly vulnerable to flooding, has become safe and prosperous due to centuries of proactive, integrated water management.
- Ghana, with more favourable geography, experiences more frequent and destructive flooding due to a lack of preparation and treating water management as a reactive rather than a permanent national priority.
- The key lesson for Ghana is to embed flood resilience into all aspects of national planning, including designing infrastructure with drainage in mind, considering flood risk in housing, and protecting critical systems.
- This requires enforcing planning laws, empowering local assemblies, preserving natural floodplains, updating drainage systems for modern rainfall patterns, and citizens avoiding indiscriminate dumping.
- Climate change intensifies the urgency, making proactive water management a critical national priority for Ghana to mitigate rising sea levels and extreme rainfall, ultimately being less costly than disaster recovery.
Why This Matters
This article highlights a critical challenge for Ghana: persistent flooding that causes significant destruction and loss. By adopting a proactive, long-term water management strategy similar to the Netherlands, Ghana can protect its citizens, infrastructure, and foster sustainable development. This shift from reactive measures to integrated planning is crucial for national resilience and economic stability in the face of increasingly unpredictable climate change.
Read Full Article
View original sourceRelated Articles
August 24, 2026
GoldBod denies GH¢1bn BoG overdraft claim, demands retraction and apology from Boako
- The Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) has vehemently denied claims by MP Dr. Gideon Boako that it owes the Bank of Ghana (BoG) a GH¢1 billion overdraft.
- Dr. Boako, a Deputy Ranking Member on Parliament’s Finance Committee, questioned GoldBod's reported GH¢907 million profit, stating an outstanding overdraft would reflect a loss.
- GoldBod labeled Dr. Boako’s claim as “totally false,” a “deliberate and malicious smear campaign,” and demanded a retraction and apology.
- This dispute is set against a broader political and economic debate concerning GoldBod’s financial performance and the accounting treatment of GH¢22 billion losses from the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme (DGPP).
- GoldBod asserts it has never taken any loan, overdraft, or debt instrument from the Bank of Ghana or any financial institution since its establishment.
August 24, 2026
GoldBod losses remain key on Minority agenda as Parliament reconvenes – Afenyo-Markin
- The NPP Minority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, reaffirmed the caucus's commitment to investigate a reported US$1.7 billion loss linked to the Bank of Ghana’s Domestic Gold Purchase Programme and the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod).
- This commitment was reiterated after Afenyo-Markin met with NPP flagbearer Dr Mahamudu Bawumia in Accra.
- Dr Bawumia commended the Minority Caucus for its accountability efforts and encouraged their continued work.
- The reported loss, equivalent to about 1.5% of Ghana’s GDP, will be a key issue for the Minority as Parliament reconvenes.
- The Minority is resolute in pursuing the matter to get answers for the Ghanaian public regarding the circumstances of the loss.
August 23, 2026
Why celebrate $2.62bn FDI while losing $1.7bn under the Domestic Gold Programme? IERPP asks
- The Institute of Economic Research and Public Policy (IERPP) welcomes Ghana's US$2.62 billion Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as a sign of investor confidence.
- However, IERPP tempers this optimism with concern over an estimated GH¢22 billion (US$1.7 billion) loss from the Domestic Gold Purchase Program (DGPP).
- The DGPP loss is significant, equating to about 65 cents for every US$1 of FDI attracted, highlighting a major resource management issue.
- IERPP emphasizes that while FDI is crucial, it cannot substitute for prudent management and protection of existing public resources.
- The Institute calls for greater transparency, a clear breakdown of DGPP losses, and intense scrutiny from accountability institutions, Parliament, and civil society.