Back to Latest Briefings

May 2, 2026
AI-Enhanced
The Bank of Ghana has not made any losses that should be a topic for discussion — Sammy Gyamfi
Money
Policy
Key Points
- Ghana Gold Board CEO Sammy Gyamfi has downplayed the Bank of Ghana's (BoG) GH¢15.6 billion operational loss in 2025, stating it's not significant enough to cause national alarm.
- The reported loss, the second highest since the 2008 cedi redenomination, has intensified political exchanges between the governing NDC and opposition NPP, with the latter blaming policy missteps.
- BoG attributes the loss primarily to monetary policy operations, the gold accumulation programme (GH¢9 billion accounting cost), and exchange rate-related accounting adjustments (GH¢19.32 billion charge due to 41% cedi appreciation).
- Officials argue the gold programme cost is not a realised loss as 111 tonnes of gold are held as reserve assets, and the cedi's appreciation reduced the cedi value of foreign-denominated reserves.
- Sammy Gyamfi defended BoG's Governor and distinguished BoG's losses from the Ghana Gold Board's profitability, while the NDC links BoG's negative equity to the 2022 Domestic Debt Exchange Programme, maintaining the bank's operational soundness.
Why This Matters
The Bank of Ghana's reported GH¢15.6 billion operational loss in 2025 is a critical issue for Ghana, sparking intense political debate and raising questions about the central bank's financial health and the government's economic management. The controversy, despite explanations attributing costs to policy choices like the gold accumulation program and cedi appreciation, can impact investor confidence and public trust in Ghana's financial stability and economic direction.
Read Full Article
View original sourceRelated Articles
August 24, 2026
GoldBod denies GH¢1bn BoG overdraft claim, demands retraction and apology from Boako
- The Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) has vehemently denied claims by MP Dr. Gideon Boako that it owes the Bank of Ghana (BoG) a GH¢1 billion overdraft.
- Dr. Boako, a Deputy Ranking Member on Parliament’s Finance Committee, questioned GoldBod's reported GH¢907 million profit, stating an outstanding overdraft would reflect a loss.
- GoldBod labeled Dr. Boako’s claim as “totally false,” a “deliberate and malicious smear campaign,” and demanded a retraction and apology.
- This dispute is set against a broader political and economic debate concerning GoldBod’s financial performance and the accounting treatment of GH¢22 billion losses from the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme (DGPP).
- GoldBod asserts it has never taken any loan, overdraft, or debt instrument from the Bank of Ghana or any financial institution since its establishment.
August 24, 2026
GoldBod losses remain key on Minority agenda as Parliament reconvenes – Afenyo-Markin
- The NPP Minority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, reaffirmed the caucus's commitment to investigate a reported US$1.7 billion loss linked to the Bank of Ghana’s Domestic Gold Purchase Programme and the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod).
- This commitment was reiterated after Afenyo-Markin met with NPP flagbearer Dr Mahamudu Bawumia in Accra.
- Dr Bawumia commended the Minority Caucus for its accountability efforts and encouraged their continued work.
- The reported loss, equivalent to about 1.5% of Ghana’s GDP, will be a key issue for the Minority as Parliament reconvenes.
- The Minority is resolute in pursuing the matter to get answers for the Ghanaian public regarding the circumstances of the loss.
August 23, 2026
Why celebrate $2.62bn FDI while losing $1.7bn under the Domestic Gold Programme? IERPP asks
- The Institute of Economic Research and Public Policy (IERPP) welcomes Ghana's US$2.62 billion Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as a sign of investor confidence.
- However, IERPP tempers this optimism with concern over an estimated GH¢22 billion (US$1.7 billion) loss from the Domestic Gold Purchase Program (DGPP).
- The DGPP loss is significant, equating to about 65 cents for every US$1 of FDI attracted, highlighting a major resource management issue.
- IERPP emphasizes that while FDI is crucial, it cannot substitute for prudent management and protection of existing public resources.
- The Institute calls for greater transparency, a clear breakdown of DGPP losses, and intense scrutiny from accountability institutions, Parliament, and civil society.

